Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:57
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Samsung could drop Google Gemini in favor of Perplexity for Galaxy S26 - Ars Technica
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
David Hogg to depart as DNC vice chair after months of turmoil - The Washington Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Why is my crush beautiful to me but not to others?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The Fastest Speed That Humans Have Traveled Is 39,937.7 Kilometers Per Hour - IFLScience
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.